Home › News › Boulder & County News
Boulder business tests for athletic genes
Some parents, experts criticize the notion
Photo by Marty Caivano
Bryce Wanjau, 3, kicks a ball through a hula hoop held by coach Guy Mitchell at Boulder Indoor Soccer on Monday.
Photo by Marty Caivano
Max Godsil, 4,left, and Iddrisu Alidu, 3, play a game in which they steal the “eggs” from a sleeping “dinosaur” while being coached at Boulder Indoor Soccer on Monday afternoon. A Boulder company is offering genetic testing for athletic prowess, but Iddrisu’s mother says athletes for decades have gravitated toward their best sports without using a test.
Born to play
Boulder-based Atlas Sports Genetics has made available a genetic test that people can use to tell which sports their children are best suited to play. The results place children into three categories:
Power/strength sports include football, basketball, hockey, weight-lifting and some track and field activities such as sprinting and jumping. Athletes with two copies of the R variant of ACTN3 land in this category.
Endurance sports include long-distance running and swimming. Athletes with two copies of the X variant of ACTN3 land in this category.
Mixed-pattern sports include sports that require both endurance and power, such as soccer and cycling. Athletes with one copy of the X variant land in this category.
Source: Atlas Sports Genetics
STORY TOOLS
More Boulder & County News
- Latest Boulder fire tally: More than 3,000 acres burned
- ‘This was a wake-up call’
- Officials: Most ignored fire evacuation warnings
Share and Enjoy [?]
At age 3, Iddrisu Alidu enjoys soccer, basketball, swimming and bicycling, and that’s all the information his mother needs to keep her son active in sports.
But some parents want more information about what sports their children are genetically suited for, and a Boulder company on Monday began offering families the chance to find out.
For $149, Atlas Sports Genetics, 2845 29th St., will send a genetic sample taken from inside a child’s cheek to a laboratory in Australia. There, technicians will analyze the ACTN3 gene, which has been linked to athletic performance.
Families can order the testing kit on the company’s Web site, www.atlasgene.com. After swabbing the inside of their child’s cheek, parents send the sample back to the Boulder office to be processed and delivered overseas, said Kevin Reilly, president and co-owner of Atlas.
In about two weeks, Atlas presents customers with a certificate indicating whether their child is a genetic fit for strength and power sports, endurance athletics or a combination of the two.
“A lot of times, people pick their sports based on influence from their parents, or they might do football or soccer if friends are doing that,” Reilly said.
Children can work toward success in any sport they choose, he said. “But if they’re better suited for something ... that’s good information to have.”
The New York Times on Sunday published a story about Atlas and its genetic test. Reilly said his company made testing kits available to the public Monday, and about 60 families so far have placed orders.
Experts, parents and coaches have both praised and criticized the test. Some support it as a tool to help children excel in sports. Others reject it as “irrelevant” and unethical, or they say one gene doesn’t provide enough information about a person to determine athletic performance.
Reilly said the genetic test should be used in conjunction with other athletic tools and training. Knowing a person’s strength at a young age can help develop skills early, he said.
For instance, gymnasts often peak at a young age.
“So our ability to identify kids for certain sports younger and younger is important,” he said.
And getting children into a sport for which they’re naturally gifted can keep them from becoming frustrated by a game that “they don’t have the best chance or ability to do.”
Researcher: Test results ‘not particularly relevant’
The genetic link to elite athletic performance was brought to light in a 2003 study published in Australia. The study analyzed the DNA of 429 elite athletes, specifically looking at the ACTN3 gene, which has different variants to either instruct the body to produce a specific muscle protein or prevent production of that protein.
People with the R variant of ACTN3 were found to have muscles capable of forceful and quick movements used in speed and power sports. People with the X variant of the gene — which prevents production of the protein — were found to be good endurance athletes.
Carl Foster, co-author of the study and director of the human performance lab at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, said a single gene doesn’t make up a person’s athletic prowess. That’s why knowledge about ACTN3 alone won’t help a person identify his or her best sport, Foster said.
“It’s not just the chance that you get one gene,” he said. “You have to get a lot of them.”
Foster said he doesn’t doubt the Australian lab can correctly identify certain variants of ACTN3 in athletes.
“But the quality of the information they give back to children is not particularly relevant,” he said.
An Olympic long jumper from Spain proved the ACTN3 research inconsistent when his test results showed no copies of the R variant that normally would be linked to success in his sport, Foster said. That proves environment, training and luck also play a role in a person’s athletic success, he said.
Exposing children to as many activities as possible is the way to find their best sport, Foster said.
Coaching to the gene
Reilly and a partner entered the talent-identification business nearly a year and a half ago.
Focus groups of parents expressed interest in genetic testing, and Reilly said his company thought it would be a “nice supplement” to its other athletic-aptitude tests.
As a weight-lifting coach, Reilly said, he would have loved to have genetic information at his disposal.
“A lot of coaches spend time with kids they like — the coachable ones,” he said. “But they are not always the ones that are the most talented.”
Peter Ambrose, director of coaching for Boulder Indoor Soccer, said he doesn’t think a genetic test would alter his coaching.
“Maybe I’m old-school, but I’m just not ready to limit it to one component as to whether a person is going to be successful in soccer,” Ambrose said. “I think you have the ability to become whatever athlete you want to become.”
Ambrose said he believes there’s “some validity to what they’re doing” and is interested in learning about the genes of some of his athletes.
“But I think it’s too little information to decide too much information,” he said.
‘Michael Jordan never had that done’
While watching her 3-year-old son run circles around a soccer field, Joanna Alidu, of Louisville, said Monday that she thinks children need to feel free to do what they love without feeling pressure to excel in something a test identified as their strength.
Athletes for decades have gravitated toward their best sports without using a test, she said.
“Michael Jordan never had that done, I’m sure,” she said.
Reilly said his organization means only to open doors for young athletes, not close them.
“We don’t want to limit people,” he said. “We want to expand people’s horizons.”


Posted by inert_gas on December 1, 2008 at 8:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)
G-A-T-T-A-C-A
Coming soon to a reality near you.
Posted by cgjj1 on December 2, 2008 at 12:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Some people need to get a life
Posted by super_boulder on December 2, 2008 at 2:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Snake Oil.
Sequenced Genome databases are like any other bit of information. Without something to truly put genes in context this information is nonsense. Nonsense on so many levels.
I wish it was my scam. Send me $150, a picture of your kid and a cotton swab I'll give you a fortune as well. -- "I have a feeling you will owe someone $150 + taxes soon and your kid is watching Family Guy at a friends house."
Posted by thesurfrider on December 2, 2008 at 5:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Florida land for sale
Posted by monkeys on December 2, 2008 at 7:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Pretty soon it will be "My kid shouldn't even bother studying for the test because she's genetically too dumb anyway. We're going to send her to a nice nail painting school instead of saving for college. The cheek swab told us to."
Posted by felaful on December 2, 2008 at 8:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Based on the criminal records of the CU football team members, maybe this could also be used as a predictor of criminal behavior.
Posted by squeezer on December 2, 2008 at 8:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Just tryin' to make a buck.
Posted by mattq331 on December 2, 2008 at 9:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This is excellent.
No longer will parents be berated for making the decisions that "screw up" their children's lives. Just blame it on a gene report from Australia!
Posted by FidelC on December 2, 2008 at 9:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Peyton and Eli Manning's parents may disagree with y'all.
I agree that this technology is too far in its infancy to be a reliable predictor of athleticism, but somewhere down the line it probably will be.
Posted by Flatirony on December 2, 2008 at 10:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Props to Boulder Indoor!!
Posted by voice_of_reason on December 2, 2008 at 1:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
For $149, I'll test your kid for common sense...
Posted by jbird on December 2, 2008 at 2:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)
This is not a test of a childs athletic prowess, it is a test of parents common sense.
Posted by SoBoPop on December 2, 2008 at 5:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Poor kids.
(Requires free registration.)
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
Camera staff does not actively monitor comments. If you believe a comment breaks the user agreement, please flag the comment and someone will take a look at it.